Portfolio

Any address. Public on-chain data, no wallet connection, nothing to sign.

Wallet total

9,482 KAS

32 KAS liquid · 130 in tokens · 9,319 in NFTs at floor

Token and NFT figures are marked at the current floor, which is an upper bound: selling any size walks the book down.

KAS: 32.13native balance, from the chain
KRC-20: 2tokens held
NFTs: 2919 collections
Listed now: 0asks by this wallet

Profit and loss

Unrealised: +3,300 KAS · +143.5% on 2,300 cost
Realised: +0 KAS across 0 closed trades
Cost basis: 2,300KAS paid for 1 marked
Marked at: 5,600KAS, from fills where they exist

What this number does and does not know

Cost is what this wallet actually paid, recorded at the time.

Value is marked at what comparable tokens have actually SOLD for. Where nothing has sold, it falls back to the cheapest ask by another wallet, and says so. Where there is neither, the position is left unmarked rather than given a number.

This wallet's own asking prices are never used as the mark. An ask you set yourself is a number you chose, not a price anyone paid.

Only purchases made on KaspaCom since KQ Book started watching are included. Mints, transfers and older buys have no cost basis and are left out rather than counted as free.

Open positions

ZMEMES #21 4 fills

paid 2,300 on 12/6/2025 · marked 5,600

median of the last 4 fills, all ranks — too few sold near this rank

+3,300

+143%

KRC-20 tokens

Balances come straight from the chain and are complete. Values do not: no marketplace publishes a bid side for KRC-20, so there is no record of what anyone would pay. A position larger than 30 days of the token's own volume is left out of the total rather than counted at a price it could never get.

NFT ownership is incomplete, and here is exactly why. There is no working public endpoint that answers “which NFTs does this address hold”. KaspaCom knows because it is their marketplace and they index it internally; that is not something they publish. So KQ Book currently shows only what it has watched happen — items this wallet listed or bought since KQ Book started watching — which for a wallet that has been quiet is nothing at all.

The chain read is what fixes this, and for this wallet it came back with nothing — either the node was slow, or these holdings predate what we can read. Until it answers, this section is a floor rather than an inventory. It says so instead of showing you a confident zero.

Bought by this wallet

ZMEMES #21

paid 2,300 KAS on 12/6/2025

comparables →

Each of these opens a page with what comparable ranks are asking, what they have actually sold for in 90 days, and how this one's price sits against both. That is the closest thing to a fair value the data supports — and it refuses to state one when there are too few comparable fills to mean anything.

Holdings, marked at floor

9,319 KAS

29 NFTs across 19 collections

An upper bound, not a valuation: floor × count. Selling any quantity walks the book down, and thin collections carry floors nothing has ever traded at.

Staking: 0 KAS/day · 0 KAS/yr
Staking EXP: 0 / 69daily wallet cap
Expedition EXP: 0per cycle
Collections: 19 1 with a mapped mechanic

Observations

5 more PIXELKREX would unlock KREX Research Terminal

+7% rare expedition drops; +5% EXP from all mechanics; +5% SOULS production

Below 6 the ones you hold contribute nothing to this activation.

medium

Holdings

These are observations about game mechanics, not recommendations. People hold NFTs for art, membership and conviction as much as yield -- KQ Book only measures the yield part, and says so.

1 of your 29 tokens are matched to their exact reward band by rarity rank. The other 28 are counted but not named, so they are costed at the lowest band their collection offers — that part of the figure is a floor, not an estimate.

Mechanics are hand-mapped and carry a verified_at date. Projects change emissions without notice.