KQBOARDKQ Book

Portfolio

Any address. Public on-chain data, no wallet connection, nothing to sign.

Wallet total
214 KAS
14 KAS liquid · 0 in tokens · 200 in NFTs at floor

Token and NFT figures are marked at the current floor, which is an upper bound: selling any size walks the book down. 1 token is left out entirely — that position is larger than 30 days of its own trading volume, so the floor price is a number nobody could get.

KAS
13.87native balance, from the chain
KRC-20
1tokens held
NFTs
21 collections
Listed now
2asks by this wallet

Profit and loss

Unrealised
-1,248 KAS · -86.2% on 1,448 cost
Realised
+0 KAS across 0 closed trades
Cost basis
1,448KAS paid for 2 marked
Marked at
200KAS, from fills where they exist
What this number does and does not know

Cost is what this wallet actually paid, recorded at the time.

Value is marked at what comparable tokens have actually SOLD for. Where nothing has sold, it falls back to the cheapest ask by another wallet, and says so. Where there is neither, the position is left unmarked rather than given a number.

This wallet's own asking prices are never used as the mark. An ask you set yourself is a number you chose, not a price anyone paid.

Only purchases made on KaspaCom since KQ Book started watching are included. Mints, transfers and older buys have no cost basis and are left out rather than counted as free.

Open positions

KRC-20 tokens

Balances come straight from the chain and are complete. Values do not: no marketplace publishes a bid side for KRC-20, so there is no record of what anyone would pay. A position larger than 30 days of the token's own volume is left out of the total rather than counted at a price it could never get.

NFT ownership is incomplete, and here is exactly why. There is no working public endpoint that answers “which NFTs does this address hold”. KaspaCom knows because it is their marketplace and they index it internally; that is not something they publish. So KQ Book currently shows only what it has watched happen — items this wallet listed or bought since KQ Book started watching — which for a wallet that has been quiet is nothing at all.

The chain read is what fixes this, and for this wallet it came back with nothing — either the node was slow, or these holdings predate what we can read. Until it answers, this section is a floor rather than an inventory. It says so instead of showing you a confident zero.

Listed by this wallet right now

Bought by this wallet

Each of these opens a page with what comparable ranks are asking, what they have actually sold for in 90 days, and how this one's price sits against both. That is the closest thing to a fair value the data supports — and it refuses to state one when there are too few comparable fills to mean anything.

Holdings, marked at floor
200 KAS
2 NFTs across 1 collections

An upper bound, not a valuation: floor × count. Selling any quantity walks the book down, and thin collections carry floors nothing has ever traded at.

Staking
0 KAS/day · 0 KAS/yr
Staking EXP
0 / 69daily wallet cap
Expedition EXP
0per cycle
Collections
1 held

Zero because none of these 1 collection has a mechanic mapped yet — not because they earn nothing. 6 projects are mapped so far, each hand-checked against the project's own rules. If one of these has staking or expeditions, it is missing from our table, not from the chain.

Holdings

These are observations about game mechanics, not recommendations. People hold NFTs for art, membership and conviction as much as yield -- KQ Book only measures the yield part, and says so.

Every token here is matched to its exact reward band by rarity rank. Nothing in this figure is assumed.

Mechanics are hand-mapped and carry a verified_at date. Projects change emissions without notice.