Portfolio
Any address. Public on-chain data, no wallet connection, nothing to sign.
Showing your wallet. Paste another address above to look at anyone else's.
Token and NFT figures are marked at the current floor, which is an upper bound: selling any size walks the book down. 14 tokens are left out entirely — those positions are larger than 30 days of their own trading volume, so the floor price is a number nobody could get.
- KAS
- 0.00native balance, from the chain
- KRC-20
- 28tokens held
- NFTs
- 00 collections
- Listed now
- 0asks by this wallet
Profit and loss
- Unrealised
- +0 KAS
- Realised
- -3,399 KAS across 1 closed trade
- Cost basis
- 0KAS paid for 0 marked
- Marked at
- 0KAS, from fills where they exist
What this number does and does not know
Cost is what this wallet actually paid, recorded at the time.
Value is marked at what comparable tokens have actually SOLD for. Where nothing has sold, it falls back to the cheapest ask by another wallet, and says so. Where there is neither, the position is left unmarked rather than given a number.
This wallet's own asking prices are never used as the mark. An ask you set yourself is a number you chose, not a price anyone paid.
Only purchases made on KaspaCom since KQ Book started watching are included. Mints, transfers and older buys have no cost basis and are left out rather than counted as free.
Closed trades
KRC-20 tokens
Balances come straight from the chain and are complete. Values do not: no marketplace publishes a bid side for KRC-20, so there is no record of what anyone would pay. A position larger than 30 days of the token's own volume is left out of the total rather than counted at a price it could never get.
The chain read is what fixes this, and for this wallet it came back with nothing — either the node was slow, or these holdings predate what we can read. Until it answers, this section is a floor rather than an inventory. It says so instead of showing you a confident zero.
Bought by this wallet
Each of these opens a page with what comparable ranks are asking, what they have actually sold for in 90 days, and how this one's price sits against both. That is the closest thing to a fair value the data supports — and it refuses to state one when there are too few comparable fills to mean anything.